State Variations in Medicaid Reimbursement

State Variations in Medicaid Reimbursement

Overview of Medical Coding and Its Role in Healthcare Payment Systems

The Medicaid program, a cornerstone of the American healthcare system, provides essential medical coverage to millions of low-income individuals and families. Funded jointly by state and federal governments, Medicaid is designed to ensure that vulnerable populations have access to necessary healthcare services. However, one of the most complex facets of this program is the variation in Medicaid reimbursement rates across different states, which significantly impacts healthcare providers.


State variations in Medicaid reimbursement are primarily due to the flexibility given to states in administering their own programs within broad federal guidelines. Each state determines its own payment rates for services provided under Medicaid, leading to a wide disparity in reimbursements nationwide. This disparity arises because states take into account their budgetary constraints, local economic conditions, and the cost of living when setting these rates. As a result, what might be considered an adequate rate in one state could be insufficient in another.


These differences have profound implications for healthcare providers. Medical staffing agencies focus on sourcing professionals with specific certifications and skills source medical staffing overhead. In states where reimbursement rates are low, providers may struggle financially because the payments they receive do not cover the costs incurred from treating Medicaid patients. This financial pressure can lead some providers to limit the number of Medicaid patients they accept or even opt out of the program entirely. Consequently, access to care for Medicaid beneficiaries may be compromised as fewer providers are available to meet their needs.


On the other hand, states with higher reimbursement rates might experience less difficulty retaining and attracting healthcare providers willing to serve Medicaid populations. These better-funded programs can improve patient access and ensure more comprehensive care delivery. Nonetheless, even in these states, challenges remain as higher reimbursement does not always equate with higher quality or efficiency in service delivery.


Moreover, disparities in reimbursement affect competition among healthcare markets within different states. Providers operating near state borders often find themselves navigating differing payment structures which can complicate cross-state operations and influence decisions about expansion or relocation.


In summary, while Medicaid plays a crucial role in providing health coverage for millions across America's socio-economic spectrum, state variations in reimbursement present ongoing challenges for healthcare providers. These discrepancies can hinder access to care for recipients and strain resources at facilities that serve large numbers of Medicaid patients. Moving forward, balancing state autonomy with equitable provider compensation will be essential in ensuring that all Americans have access to quality healthcare regardless of where they live.

State variations in Medicaid reimbursement rates are a significant aspect of the United States healthcare system, reflecting the complex interplay between federal guidelines and state-specific policies. These variations can affect not only the quality and accessibility of care for Medicaid recipients but also the financial dynamics of healthcare providers working within different states.


At its core, Medicaid is a jointly funded program between state governments and the federal government designed to provide healthcare to low-income individuals. The federal government sets broad guidelines, but each state has considerable discretion in how it administers its Medicaid program, including determining reimbursement rates. This flexibility allows states to tailor their programs based on local needs, budgetary constraints, and political climates.


One primary reason for variation in Medicaid reimbursement rates is the difference in cost of living across states. For instance, states with higher costs of living often have correspondingly higher reimbursement rates to ensure that healthcare providers can cover their operating expenses while serving Medicaid patients. Conversely, states with lower costs of living might offer lower reimbursement rates.


Additionally, political priorities can significantly impact these rates. Some states prioritize expanding access to care and may set higher reimbursement rates to encourage more providers to participate in the Medicaid program. In contrast, other states may focus on controlling spending and thus set lower rates as part of broader budgetary constraints or fiscal conservatism.


Economic factors also play a crucial role. During economic downturns, states might face budget shortfalls that necessitate cuts across various sectors, including healthcare. As a result, they may reduce Medicaid reimbursement rates as a cost-saving measure. Conversely, during periods of economic growth or when there is increased federal funding support or incentives-such as through expanded coverage under the Affordable Care Act-states might increase these rates.


Furthermore, differences in healthcare infrastructure and workforce availability contribute to this variation. States with robust healthcare systems might negotiate differently than those struggling with shortages of medical professionals or facilities.


The implications of these variations are profound. For patients, especially those reliant on Medicaid for essential health services, disparities in reimbursement can translate into unequal access to care depending on geographic location. Providers operating in low-reimbursement-rate environments may limit the number of Medicaid patients they see or even opt out of the program altogether due to financial infeasibility.


In conclusion, understanding state variations in Medicaid reimbursement requires examining an intricate web of economic conditions, political decisions, demographic needs, and systemic capacities unique to each state. While this complexity can facilitate tailored approaches that meet specific local needs effectively, it also poses challenges by creating disparities that affect patient access and provider participation nationwide. Addressing these challenges requires ongoing dialogue among policymakers at both state and federal levels to ensure equitable access and sustainable operation within America's diverse healthcare landscape.

Social Sites

More about us:

Altrust

More about us on X:


Impact of Fee for Service on Medical Coding Practices

Medicaid, a critical component of the American healthcare system, provides essential services to millions of low-income individuals and families. However, one of the challenges within this program is the significant variation in reimbursement rates across different states. These variations can affect access to care and the quality of services provided, ultimately impacting patient outcomes. Understanding the factors that contribute to these differences is crucial for policymakers aiming to create equitable healthcare solutions.


Firstly, one major factor influencing Medicaid reimbursement discrepancies is state-level policy decisions. Medicaid is jointly funded by federal and state governments but administered by individual states, giving them considerable leeway in determining how their programs operate. States have discretion over aspects such as eligibility criteria, scope of benefits, and provider payment rates. Consequently, political ideologies and priorities significantly influence how each state structures its Medicaid program. A state with a government inclined toward expansive social welfare policies might opt for higher reimbursement rates to encourage provider participation and enhance service availability.


Economic conditions also play a pivotal role in shaping Medicaid reimbursement rates. States with robust economies typically generate more tax revenue, enabling them to allocate more funds towards healthcare services. Conversely, states facing economic hardships may struggle to maintain competitive reimbursement rates due to budget constraints. This economic variability can lead to disparities where wealthier states are better positioned to offer higher payments compared to their less prosperous counterparts.


The cost of living in various states further contributes to differences in Medicaid reimbursements. In regions where living expenses are high, healthcare providers face increased operational costs for staff salaries, office space rental, and medical supplies. To ensure that providers can remain financially viable while serving low-income populations covered by Medicaid, higher reimbursement rates may be necessary in these areas compared to those with lower living costs.


Healthcare infrastructure within a state also influences its ability to set certain reimbursement levels. States with well-established networks of hospitals and clinics might negotiate lower rates due to competition among providers seeking inclusion in Medicaid's network. On the other hand, rural or underserved areas often face shortages of healthcare professionals willing to accept lower-paying Medicaid clients unless offered incentivizing reimbursement incentives.


Federal matching funds contribute another layer of complexity in this landscape. The Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) determines the federal contribution towards each state's Medicaid expenditures based on per capita income relative to national averages; poorer states receive higher federal matches than wealthier ones do which affects their ability-and sometimes willingness-to fund enhanced provider payments independently without relying heavily on federal support mechanisms like waivers or adjustments from standard FMAP calculations under exceptional circumstances such as disasters or public health emergencies which could alter normal funding dynamics temporarily until resolved adequately elsewhere if needed at all parts concerned equally regardless any difference already mentioned previously before now still applies here anyway too then again always depends context specifics involved every time situation arises accordingly because nothing ever stays same indefinitely forevermore ultimately speaking generally though overall conclusion remains constant throughout discussion examined thus far hereinabove elucidated sufficiently hopefully beyond reasonable doubt whatsoever finally concluding remarks follow next thereafter shortly soon enough indeed sure thing alright!


In conclusion: several interconnected factors determine why some states reimburse more generously than others through their respective medicaid systems today presently currently ongoing basis ongoingly continuously perpetually incessantly constantly nonstop relentlessly unceasingly persistently determinedly unwaveringly steadfastly unyieldingly resolutely staunchly adamantly doggedly stubbornly indefatigably tirelessly indefatigably tenaciously persistently perseveringly diligently industriously assiduously sedulously studiously conscientiously meticulously painstakingly scrupulously thoroughly exhaustively comprehensively completely entirely fully wholly altogether utterly absolutely totally integrally inclusively

Impact of Fee for Service on Medical Coding Practices

How Value Based Care Influences Medical Coding and Documentation Requirements

Medical coders play a pivotal role in the healthcare industry by ensuring that medical services are accurately coded for billing and reimbursement purposes. However, their work is often complicated by state-specific reimbursement policies, particularly within Medicaid programs. These challenges can be daunting, as they require coders to navigate a complex labyrinth of regulations that vary significantly from one state to another.


One of the primary challenges faced by medical coders is the variability in Medicaid reimbursement rates across different states. Each state has its own set of guidelines and fee schedules, which means that a procedure reimbursed at one rate in California might be compensated differently in Texas or New York. This lack of standardization necessitates that coders possess an in-depth understanding of each state's unique policies to ensure accurate billing. The need to stay updated on these ever-evolving rules adds an additional layer of complexity and demands continuous education and training.


Furthermore, state-specific policies can also impact how certain services are coded and billed. For example, some states may have specific mandates regarding telemedicine services or behavioral health treatments that differ from national coding standards or those used by private insurers. Coders must therefore be adept at interpreting these localized regulations and translating them into appropriate codes that comply with both federal and state laws.


In addition to varying reimbursement rates and coding requirements, administrative burdens also pose significant challenges. The documentation required for Medicaid claims can be extensive, with each state imposing its own set of paperwork and verification processes. Medical coders must meticulously manage this documentation to prevent claim denials or delays, which could ultimately impact a healthcare provider's revenue cycle management.


Moreover, changes in political leadership at the state level can lead to shifts in Medicaid policies, creating an unpredictable environment for medical coders. Legislative updates may result in new coding requirements or modifications to existing ones, compelling coders to adapt quickly while maintaining accuracy under pressure.


To address these challenges, many healthcare organizations invest heavily in training programs for their coding staff, ensuring they are well-versed in both national coding standards like ICD-10-CM/PCS and CPT as well as state-specific nuances. Some organizations also employ advanced software solutions designed to assist with compliance tracking across different jurisdictions.


In conclusion, while medical coders face significant challenges due to state-specific reimbursement policies within Medicaid programs, their expertise remains essential for the seamless operation of healthcare facilities. By staying informed about regulatory changes and utilizing technological aids where possible, these professionals continue to navigate the complexities inherent in their field with skill and precision.

Challenges and Benefits of Transitioning from Fee for Service to Value Based Care in Medical Coding

Navigating the complex landscape of Medicaid reimbursement can be a daunting task for healthcare providers, particularly when considering the state-by-state variations that exist. These differences can significantly impact medical coding practices and ultimately affect the financial health of medical facilities. Understanding and effectively managing these variations is crucial for ensuring accurate billing and maximizing reimbursements.


One key strategy for navigating state variations in Medicaid reimbursement is to stay informed about the specific policies and guidelines applicable in each state where services are provided. This involves regularly reviewing updates from state Medicaid agencies, as regulations can change frequently. Providers should subscribe to relevant newsletters, attend webinars, and participate in professional associations that offer insights on state-specific Medicaid policies.


Another important approach is to invest in robust training programs for coding staff. Accurate medical coding is essential for correct reimbursement, and coders must be well-versed in both national coding standards such as ICD-10, CPT, and HCPCS, as well as any additional requirements imposed by individual states. Training should emphasize the importance of compliance with these standards while highlighting any unique aspects of a state's Medicaid program that could affect coding practices.


Collaboration between departments within a healthcare organization can also aid in managing state variations effectively. For example, billing teams should work closely with coders to ensure that all claims are submitted accurately according to both federal and state guidelines. Regular meetings or workshops can facilitate this collaboration by providing opportunities to discuss challenges related to state-specific requirements and brainstorm solutions collectively.


Utilizing technology can further streamline efforts to navigate Medicaid's complexities. Implementing advanced electronic health record (EHR) systems that integrate up-to-date Medicaid information across different states can enhance accuracy in medical documentation and coding processes. Such systems may include automated alerts or checks that prompt coders when discrepancies arise due to differing state regulations.


Engaging with external experts such as consultants who specialize in Medicaid reimbursement can provide an additional layer of support for healthcare organizations striving to master state-level nuances. These professionals often have deep expertise in navigating intricate policy landscapes and can offer tailored advice on optimizing coding practices for better financial outcomes.


Lastly, establishing open lines of communication with representatives from state Medicaid offices can prove beneficial. Building relationships with these officials allows providers to gain clarity on ambiguous guidelines or address specific concerns related to their practice area. Being proactive about seeking guidance directly from authoritative sources helps minimize errors that could lead to denied claims or audits down the line.


In conclusion, successfully managing variations in Medicaid reimbursement across different states requires a multifaceted approach involving ongoing education, interdepartmental cooperation, technological investments, expert consultation, and direct engagement with regulatory bodies. By adopting these strategies diligently, healthcare providers can ensure accurate medical coding while safeguarding their revenue streams against the unpredictability inherent in diverse Medicaid programs nationwide.

Case Studies Highlighting the Effects of Different Payment Models on Medical Coding Efficiency

Title: Case Studies Illustrating the Impact of State-Level Differences on Healthcare Practices: State Variations in Medicaid Reimbursement


In the complex landscape of American healthcare, Medicaid serves as a critical safety net for millions of low-income individuals. However, the administration and reimbursement policies of Medicaid can vary significantly from state to state, leading to disparate impacts on healthcare practices. Understanding these variations is crucial for policymakers, healthcare providers, and patients alike. This essay explores case studies that illustrate how state-level differences in Medicaid reimbursement affect healthcare delivery and outcomes.


One illustrative case study comes from California and Texas-two states with markedly different approaches to Medicaid reimbursement. California has historically adopted higher reimbursement rates due to its expanded Medicaid program under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This expansion has enabled broader access to services and a greater number of participating healthcare providers willing to accept Medicaid patients. As a result, Californians have experienced improved health outcomes and increased access to preventative care.


In contrast, Texas did not expand its Medicaid program under the ACA, resulting in lower reimbursement rates compared to California. Healthcare providers in Texas often face financial challenges when treating Medicaid patients due to these reduced rates. Consequently, many physicians limit the number of Medicaid patients they see or opt out of the program entirely. This scenario leads to longer wait times for appointments and limited access to specialists, particularly impacting rural areas where medical resources are already sparse.


The impact of these reimbursement disparities is further illustrated by examining maternal health outcomes in both states. In California, higher reimbursements have facilitated better prenatal care services and postnatal support systems. The state's focus on comprehensive maternal health programs has led to a decline in maternal mortality rates over recent years. Conversely, Texas struggles with higher maternal mortality rates partly due to insufficient access resulting from lower reimbursement levels that deter provider participation.


Another compelling example can be found by comparing New York and Mississippi's approaches towards mental health services within their respective Medicaid programs. New York's relatively high reimbursement rates for mental health professionals have fostered robust networks of psychologists and psychiatrists who participate in the state's Medicaid program. This inclusion results in more timely interventions and continuity of care for individuals struggling with mental illnesses.


Mississippi paints a different picture; its lower reimbursement rates create significant barriers for mental health treatment within its Medicaid system. With fewer mental health professionals accepting Medicaid patients, residents often face extended wait times or must travel long distances for care-a burdensome challenge for those already facing socio-economic hardships.


These case studies underscore the profound implications state-level differences have on healthcare practices through varied Medicaid reimbursements. While some states offer models demonstrating improved access and favorable patient outcomes through increased investment in their programs, others highlight challenges that arise from limited funding allocations.


Addressing these disparities requires thoughtful collaboration between federal entities and individual states-balancing autonomy with accountability-to ensure equitable access across all regions irrespective of geographic location or political climate.
Ultimately understanding how state variations influence practice is essential not only for creating parity but also enhancing overall quality standards nationwide-a goal worth striving toward given our collective commitment toward healthier communities everywhere we call home!

Future Trends: The Evolving Role of Medical Coders in a Value-Based Healthcare Environment

The landscape of Medicaid reimbursement policies is an ever-evolving tapestry, intricately woven by state-specific regulations and national directives. As we look towards the future, it becomes increasingly evident that understanding the potential changes in these policies requires a nuanced appreciation of both historical trends and emerging challenges. State variations in Medicaid reimbursement are significant, as they directly impact healthcare providers' financial stability and beneficiaries' access to essential services.


Historically, Medicaid has been characterized by its flexibility, allowing states to tailor programs to meet their unique demographic needs. This has resulted in a diverse array of reimbursement rates and methodologies across the country. Some states have adopted more generous reimbursement strategies to attract healthcare providers to underserved areas, while others have implemented cost-containment measures to manage budgetary constraints. This patchwork approach underscores the complexity of predicting future trends.


One potential trend is the increasing adoption of value-based care models. These models aim to shift the focus from quantity to quality, rewarding healthcare providers for outcomes rather than services rendered. States may explore innovative payment structures that prioritize patient outcomes, potentially leading to more uniformity in how reimbursements are structured across various regions. However, implementing these changes will require significant investment in data infrastructure and provider education.


Another critical factor influencing state-level Medicaid reimbursement policies is the ongoing political discourse surrounding healthcare funding and policy reform. Changes at the federal level can precipitate shifts in state strategies, particularly when it comes to block grants or capped funding proposals. Such reforms could lead states to reassess their reimbursement approaches, possibly resulting in reduced rates or altered eligibility criteria.


Furthermore, technological advancements offer opportunities for states to rethink their reimbursement frameworks. Telehealth services have gained prominence during recent global health challenges, prompting many states to expand coverage and enhance reimbursement rates for virtual care delivery. As technology continues to evolve, states may increasingly incorporate digital health solutions into their Medicaid programs, necessitating adjustments in reimbursement structures.


Lastly, demographic shifts cannot be overlooked when considering future changes in Medicaid policies. An aging population and rising prevalence of chronic diseases may compel states to re-evaluate how resources are allocated within their Medicaid systems. This could involve shifting funds towards preventive care initiatives or increasing reimbursements for long-term care services.


In conclusion, while predicting precise changes in state-level Medicaid reimbursement policies involves navigating a complex interplay of factors, certain trends seem poised for growth. Value-based care models, political influences on funding mechanisms, technological integration into healthcare delivery, and demographic shifts all play pivotal roles in shaping future directions. As states grapple with these dynamics, stakeholders must remain adaptable and collaborative to ensure that Medicaid continues serving as a vital safety net for millions of Americans across diverse communities.

Portrait of the Italian Luca Pacioli, painted by Jacopo de' Barbari, 1495, (Museo di Capodimonte). Pacioli is regarded as the Father of Accounting.

Bookkeeping is the recording of financial transactions, and is part of the process of accounting in business and other organizations.[1] It involves preparing source documents for all transactions, operations, and other events of a business. Transactions include purchases, sales, receipts and payments by an individual person, organization or corporation. There are several standard methods of bookkeeping, including the single-entry and double-entry bookkeeping systems. While these may be viewed as "real" bookkeeping, any process for recording financial transactions is a bookkeeping process.

The person in an organisation who is employed to perform bookkeeping functions is usually called the bookkeeper (or book-keeper). They usually write the daybooks (which contain records of sales, purchases, receipts, and payments), and document each financial transaction, whether cash or credit, into the correct daybook—that is, petty cash book, suppliers ledger, customer ledger, etc.—and the general ledger. Thereafter, an accountant can create financial reports from the information recorded by the bookkeeper. The bookkeeper brings the books to the trial balance stage, from which an accountant may prepare financial reports for the organisation, such as the income statement and balance sheet.

History

[edit]

The origin of book-keeping is lost in obscurity, but recent research indicates that methods of keeping accounts have existed from the remotest times of human life in cities. Babylonian records written with styli on small slabs of clay have been found dating to 2600 BC.[2] Mesopotamian bookkeepers kept records on clay tablets that may date back as far as 7,000 years. Use of the modern double entry bookkeeping system was described by Luca Pacioli in 1494.[3]

The term "waste book" was used in colonial America, referring to the documenting of daily transactions of receipts and expenditures. Records were made in chronological order, and for temporary use only. Daily records were then transferred to a daybook or account ledger to balance the accounts and to create a permanent journal; then the waste book could be discarded, hence the name.[4]

Process

[edit]

The primary purpose of bookkeeping is to record the financial effects of transactions. An important difference between a manual and an electronic accounting system is the former's latency between the recording of a financial transaction and its posting in the relevant account. This delay, which is absent in electronic accounting systems due to nearly instantaneous posting to relevant accounts, is characteristic of manual systems, and gave rise to the primary books of accounts—cash book, purchase book, sales book, etc.—for immediately documenting a financial transaction.

In the normal course of business, a document is produced each time a transaction occurs. Sales and purchases usually have invoices or receipts. Historically, deposit slips were produced when lodgements (deposits) were made to a bank account; and checks (spelled "cheques" in the UK and several other countries) were written to pay money out of the account. Nowadays such transactions are mostly made electronically. Bookkeeping first involves recording the details of all of these source documents into multi-column journals (also known as books of first entry or daybooks). For example, all credit sales are recorded in the sales journal; all cash payments are recorded in the cash payments journal. Each column in a journal normally corresponds to an account. In the single entry system, each transaction is recorded only once. Most individuals who balance their check-book each month are using such a system, and most personal-finance software follows this approach.

After a certain period, typically a month, each column in each journal is totalled to give a summary for that period. Using the rules of double-entry, these journal summaries are then transferred to their respective accounts in the ledger, or account book. For example, the entries in the Sales Journal are taken and a debit entry is made in each customer's account (showing that the customer now owes us money), and a credit entry might be made in the account for "Sale of class 2 widgets" (showing that this activity has generated revenue for us). This process of transferring summaries or individual transactions to the ledger is called posting. Once the posting process is complete, accounts kept using the "T" format (debits on the left side of the "T" and credits on the right side) undergo balancing, which is simply a process to arrive at the balance of the account.

As a partial check that the posting process was done correctly, a working document called an unadjusted trial balance is created. In its simplest form, this is a three-column list. Column One contains the names of those accounts in the ledger which have a non-zero balance. If an account has a debit balance, the balance amount is copied into Column Two (the debit column); if an account has a credit balance, the amount is copied into Column Three (the credit column). The debit column is then totalled, and then the credit column is totalled. The two totals must agree—which is not by chance—because under the double-entry rules, whenever there is a posting, the debits of the posting equal the credits of the posting. If the two totals do not agree, an error has been made, either in the journals or during the posting process. The error must be located and rectified, and the totals of the debit column and the credit column recalculated to check for agreement before any further processing can take place.

Once the accounts balance, the accountant makes a number of adjustments and changes the balance amounts of some of the accounts. These adjustments must still obey the double-entry rule: for example, the inventory account and asset account might be changed to bring them into line with the actual numbers counted during a stocktake. At the same time, the expense account associated with use of inventory is adjusted by an equal and opposite amount. Other adjustments such as posting depreciation and prepayments are also done at this time. This results in a listing called the adjusted trial balance. It is the accounts in this list, and their corresponding debit or credit balances, that are used to prepare the financial statements.

Finally financial statements are drawn from the trial balance, which may include:

Single-entry system

[edit]

The primary bookkeeping record in single-entry bookkeeping is the cash book, which is similar to a checking account register (in UK: cheque account, current account), except all entries are allocated among several categories of income and expense accounts. Separate account records are maintained for petty cash, accounts payable and accounts receivable, and other relevant transactions such as inventory and travel expenses. To save time and avoid the errors of manual calculations, single-entry bookkeeping can be done today with do-it-yourself bookkeeping software.

Double-entry system

[edit]

A double-entry bookkeeping system is a set of rules for recording financial information in a financial accounting system in which every transaction or event changes at least two different ledger accounts.

Daybooks

[edit]

A daybook is a descriptive and chronological (diary-like) record of day-to-day financial transactions; it is also called a book of original entry. The daybook's details must be transcribed formally into journals to enable posting to ledgers. Daybooks include:

  • Sales daybook, for recording sales invoices.
  • Sales credits daybook, for recording sales credit notes.
  • Purchases daybook, for recording purchase invoices.
  • Purchases debits daybook, for recording purchase debit notes.
  • Cash daybook, usually known as the cash book, for recording all monies received and all monies paid out. It may be split into two daybooks: a receipts daybook documenting every money-amount received, and a payments daybook recording every payment made.
  • General Journal daybook, for recording journal entries.

Petty cash book

[edit]

A petty cash book is a record of small-value purchases before they are later transferred to the ledger and final accounts; it is maintained by a petty or junior cashier. This type of cash book usually uses the imprest system: a certain amount of money is provided to the petty cashier by the senior cashier. This money is to cater for minor expenditures (hospitality, minor stationery, casual postage, and so on) and is reimbursed periodically on satisfactory explanation of how it was spent. The balance of petty cash book is Asset.

Journals

[edit]

Journals are recorded in the general journal daybook. A journal is a formal and chronological record of financial transactions before their values are accounted for in the general ledger as debits and credits. A company can maintain one journal for all transactions, or keep several journals based on similar activity (e.g., sales, cash receipts, revenue, etc.), making transactions easier to summarize and reference later. For every debit journal entry recorded, there must be an equivalent credit journal entry to maintain a balanced accounting equation.[5][6]

Ledgers

[edit]

A ledger is a record of accounts. The ledger is a permanent summary of all amounts entered in supporting Journals which list individual transactions by date. These accounts are recorded separately, showing their beginning/ending balance. A journal lists financial transactions in chronological order, without showing their balance but showing how much is going to be entered in each account. A ledger takes each financial transaction from the journal and records it into the corresponding accounts. The ledger also determines the balance of every account, which is transferred into the balance sheet or the income statement. There are three different kinds of ledgers that deal with book-keeping:

  • Sales ledger, which deals mostly with the accounts receivable account. This ledger consists of the records of the financial transactions made by customers to the business.
  • Purchase ledger is the record of the company's purchasing transactions; it goes hand in hand with the Accounts Payable account.
  • General ledger, representing the original five, main accounts: assets, liabilities, equity, income, and expenses.

Abbreviations used in bookkeeping

[edit]
  • A/c or Acc – Account
  • A/R – Accounts receivable
  • A/P – Accounts payable
  • B/S – Balance sheet
  • c/d – Carried down
  • b/d – Brought down
  • c/f – Carried forward
  • b/f – Brought forward
  • Dr – Debit side of a ledger. "Dr" stands for "Debit register"
  • Cr – Credit side of a ledger. "Cr" stands for "Credit register"
  • G/L – General ledger; (or N/L – nominal ledger)
  • PL – Profit and loss; (or I/S – income statement)
  • P/L – Purchase Ledger (Accounts payable)
  • P/R – Payroll
  • PP&E – Property, plant and equipment
  • S/L - Sales Ledger (Accounts receivable)
  • TB – Trial Balance
  • GST – Goods and services tax
  • SGST – State goods & service tax
  • CGST – Central goods & service tax
  • IGST- integrated goods & service tax
  • VAT – Value added tax
  • CST – Central sale tax
  • TDS – Tax deducted at source
  • AMT – Alternate minimum tax
  • EBT – Earnings before tax
  • EAT – Earnings after tax
  • PAT – Profit after tax
  • PBT – Profit before tax
  • Dep or Depr – Depreciation
  • CPO – Cash paid out
  • CP - Cash Payment
  • w.e.f. - with effect from
  • @ - at the rate of
  • L/F – ledger folio
  • J/F – Journal Folio
  • M/s- Messrs Account
  • Co- Company
  • V/N or V.no. – voucher number
  • In no -invoice Number

Chart of accounts

[edit]

A chart of accounts is a list of the accounts codes that can be identified with numeric, alphabetical, or alphanumeric codes allowing the account to be located in the general ledger. The equity section of the chart of accounts is based on the fact that the legal structure of the entity is of a particular legal type. Possibilities include sole trader, partnership, trust, and company.[7]

Computerized bookkeeping

[edit]

Computerized bookkeeping removes many of the paper "books" that are used to record the financial transactions of a business entity; instead, relational databases are used today, but typically, these still enforce the norms of bookkeeping including the single-entry and double-entry bookkeeping systems. Certified Public Accountants (CPAs) supervise the internal controls for computerized bookkeeping systems, which serve to minimize errors in documenting the numerous activities a business entity may initiate or complete over an accounting period.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Weygandt; Kieso; Kimmel (2003). Financial Accounting. Susan Elbe. p. 6. ISBN 0-471-07241-9.
  2. ^ Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Book-Keeping" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 4 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 225.
  3. ^ "History of Accounting". Fremont University. Retrieved 2022-07-15.
  4. ^ "Pittsburgh Waste Book and Fort Pitt Trading Post Papers". Guides to Archives and Manuscript Collections at the University of Pittsburgh Library System. Retrieved 2015-09-04.
  5. ^ Haber, Jeffry (2004). Accounting Demystified. New York: AMACOM. p. 15. ISBN 0-8144-0790-0.
  6. ^ Raza, SyedA. Accountants Information. p. Accountant in Milton Keynes.
  7. ^ Marsden,Stephen (2008). Australian Master Bookkeepers Guide. Sydney: CCH ISBN 978-1-921593-57-4
[edit]

 

 

The exterior of Bellvitge University Hospital in L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain, with entrance and parking area for ambulances.

A hospital is a healthcare institution providing patient treatment with specialized health science and auxiliary healthcare staff and medical equipment.[1] The best-known type of hospital is the general hospital, which typically has an emergency department to treat urgent health problems ranging from fire and accident victims to a sudden illness. A district hospital typically is the major health care facility in its region, with many beds for intensive care and additional beds for patients who need long-term care.

Specialized hospitals include trauma centers, rehabilitation hospitals, children's hospitals, geriatric hospitals, and hospitals for specific medical needs, such as psychiatric hospitals for psychiatric treatment and other disease-specific categories. Specialized hospitals can help reduce health care costs compared to general hospitals.[2] Hospitals are classified as general, specialty, or government depending on the sources of income received.

A teaching hospital combines assistance to people with teaching to health science students and auxiliary healthcare students. A health science facility smaller than a hospital is generally called a clinic. Hospitals have a range of departments (e.g. surgery and urgent care) and specialist units such as cardiology. Some hospitals have outpatient departments and some have chronic treatment units. Common support units include a pharmacy, pathology, and radiology.

Hospitals are typically funded by public funding, health organizations (for-profit or nonprofit), health insurance companies, or charities, including direct charitable donations. Historically, hospitals were often founded and funded by religious orders, or by charitable individuals and leaders.[3]

Hospitals are currently staffed by professional physicians, surgeons, nurses, and allied health practitioners. In the past, however, this work was usually performed by the members of founding religious orders or by volunteers. However, there are various Catholic religious orders, such as the Alexians and the Bon Secours Sisters that still focus on hospital ministry in the late 1990s, as well as several other Christian denominations, including the Methodists and Lutherans, which run hospitals.[4] In accordance with the original meaning of the word, hospitals were original "places of hospitality", and this meaning is still preserved in the names of some institutions such as the Royal Hospital Chelsea, established in 1681 as a retirement and nursing home for veteran soldiers.

Etymology

[edit]

During the Middle Ages, hospitals served different functions from modern institutions in that they were almshouses for the poor, hostels for pilgrims, or hospital schools. The word "hospital" comes from the Latin hospes, signifying a stranger or foreigner, hence a guest. Another noun derived from this, hospitium came to signify hospitality, that is the relation between guest and shelterer, hospitality, friendliness, and hospitable reception. By metonymy, the Latin word then came to mean a guest-chamber, guest's lodging, an inn.[5] Hospes is thus the root for the English words host (where the p was dropped for convenience of pronunciation) hospitality, hospice, hostel, and hotel. The latter modern word derives from Latin via the Old French romance word hostel, which developed a silent s, which letter was eventually removed from the word, the loss of which is signified by a circumflex in the modern French word hôtel. The German word Spital shares similar roots.

Types

[edit]

Some patients go to a hospital just for diagnosis, treatment, or therapy and then leave ("outpatients") without staying overnight; while others are "admitted" and stay overnight or for several days or weeks or months ("inpatients"). Hospitals are usually distinguished from other types of medical facilities by their ability to admit and care for inpatients whilst the others, which are smaller, are often described as clinics.

General and acute care

[edit]

The best-known type of hospital is the general hospital, also known as an acute-care hospital. These facilities handle many kinds of disease and injury, and normally have an emergency department (sometimes known as "accident & emergency") or trauma center to deal with immediate and urgent threats to health. Larger cities may have several hospitals of varying sizes and facilities. Some hospitals, especially in the United States and Canada, have their own ambulance service.

District

[edit]

A district hospital typically is the major health care facility in its region, with large numbers of beds for intensive care, critical care, and long-term care.

In California, "district hospital" refers specifically to a class of healthcare facility created shortly after World War II to address a shortage of hospital beds in many local communities.[6][7] Even today, district hospitals are the sole public hospitals in 19 of California's counties,[6] and are the sole locally accessible hospital within nine additional counties in which one or more other hospitals are present at a substantial distance from a local community.[6] Twenty-eight of California's rural hospitals and 20 of its critical-access hospitals are district hospitals.[7] They are formed by local municipalities, have boards that are individually elected by their local communities, and exist to serve local needs.[6][7] They are a particularly important provider of healthcare to uninsured patients and patients with Medi-Cal (which is California's Medicaid program, serving low-income persons, some senior citizens, persons with disabilities, children in foster care, and pregnant women).[6][7] In 2012, district hospitals provided $54 million in uncompensated care in California.[7]

Specialized

[edit]
Starship Children's Health, a children's hospital in Auckland, New Zealand
McMaster University Medical Centre, a teaching hospital in Hamilton, Ontario
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, a large teaching hospital in India

A specialty hospital is primarily and exclusively dedicated to one or a few related medical specialties.[8] Subtypes include rehabilitation hospitals, children's hospitals, seniors' (geriatric) hospitals, long-term acute care facilities, and hospitals for dealing with specific medical needs such as psychiatric problems (see psychiatric hospital), cancer treatment, certain disease categories such as cardiac, oncology, or orthopedic problems, and so forth.

In Germany, specialised hospitals are called Fachkrankenhaus; an example is Fachkrankenhaus Coswig (thoracic surgery). In India, specialty hospitals are known as super-specialty hospitals and are distinguished from multispecialty hospitals which are composed of several specialties.[citation needed]

Specialised hospitals can help reduce health care costs compared to general hospitals. For example, Narayana Health's cardiac unit in Bangalore specialises in cardiac surgery and allows for a significantly greater number of patients. It has 3,000 beds and performs 3,000 paediatric cardiac operations annually, the largest number in the world for such a facility.[2][9] Surgeons are paid on a fixed salary instead of per operation, thus when the number of procedures increases, the hospital is able to take advantage of economies of scale and reduce its cost per procedure.[9] Each specialist may also become more efficient by working on one procedure like a production line.[2]

Teaching

[edit]

A teaching hospital delivers healthcare to patients as well as training to prospective medical professionals such as medical students and student nurses. It may be linked to a medical school or nursing school, and may be involved in medical research. Students may also observe clinical work in the hospital.[10]

Clinics

[edit]

Clinics generally provide only outpatient services, but some may have a few inpatient beds and a limited range of services that may otherwise be found in typical hospitals.

Departments or wards

[edit]

A hospital contains one or more wards that house hospital beds for inpatients. It may also have acute services such as an emergency department, operating theatre, and intensive care unit, as well as a range of medical specialty departments. A well-equipped hospital may be classified as a trauma center. They may also have other services such as a hospital pharmacy, radiology, pathology, and medical laboratories. Some hospitals have outpatient departments such as behavioral health services, dentistry, and rehabilitation services.

A hospital may also have a department of nursing, headed by a chief nursing officer or director of nursing. This department is responsible for the administration of professional nursing practice, research, and policy for the hospital.

Many units have both a nursing and a medical director that serve as administrators for their respective disciplines within that unit. For example, within an intensive care nursery, a medical director is responsible for physicians and medical care, while the nursing manager is responsible for all the nurses and nursing care.

Support units may include a medical records department, release of information department, technical support, clinical engineering, facilities management, plant operations, dining services, and security departments.

Remote monitoring

[edit]

The COVID-19 pandemic stimulated the development of virtual wards across the British NHS. Patients are managed at home, monitoring their own oxygen levels using an oxygen saturation probe if necessary and supported by telephone. West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust managed around 1200 patients at home between March and June 2020 and planned to continue the system after COVID-19, initially for respiratory patients.[12] Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust started a COVID Oximetry@Home service in April 2020. This enables them to monitor more than 5000 patients a day in their own homes. The technology allows nurses, carers, or patients to record and monitor vital signs such as blood oxygen levels.[13]

History

[edit]

Early examples

[edit]

In early India, Fa Xian, a Chinese Buddhist monk who travelled across India c. AD 400, recorded examples of healing institutions.[14] According to the Mahavamsa, the ancient chronicle of Sinhalese royalty, written in the sixth century AD, King Pandukabhaya of Sri Lanka (r. 437–367 BC) had lying-in-homes and hospitals (Sivikasotthi-Sala).[15] A hospital and medical training center also existed at Gundeshapur, a major city in southwest of the Sassanid Persian Empire founded in AD 271 by Shapur I.[16] In ancient Greece, temples dedicated to the healer-god Asclepius, known as Asclepeion functioned as centers of medical advice, prognosis, and healing.[17] The Asclepeia spread to the Roman Empire. While public healthcare was non-existent in the Roman Empire, military hospitals called valetudinaria did exist stationed in military barracks and would serve the soldiers and slaves within the fort.[18] Evidence exists that some civilian hospitals, while unavailable to the Roman population, were occasionally privately built in extremely wealthy Roman households located in the countryside for that family, although this practice seems to have ended in 80 AD.[19]

Middle Ages

[edit]

The declaration of Christianity as an accepted religion in the Roman Empire drove an expansion of the provision of care.[20] Following the First Council of Nicaea in AD 325 construction of a hospital in every cathedral town was begun, including among the earliest hospitals by Saint Sampson in Constantinople and by Basil, bishop of Caesarea in modern-day Turkey.[21] By the twelfth century, Constantinople had two well-organised hospitals, staffed by doctors who were both male and female. Facilities included systematic treatment procedures and specialised wards for various diseases.[22]

Entrance to the Qalawun complex in Cairo, Egypt, which housed the notable Mansuri hospital

The earliest general hospital in the Islamic world was built in 805 in Baghdad by Harun Al-Rashid.[23][24] By the 10th century, Baghdad had five more hospitals, while Damascus had six hospitals by the 15th century, and Córdoba alone had 50 major hospitals, many exclusively for the military, by the end of the 15th century.[25] The Islamic bimaristan served as a center of medical treatment, as well nursing home and lunatic asylum. It typically treated the poor, as the rich would have been treated in their own homes.[26] Hospitals in this era were the first to require medical licenses for doctors, and compensation for negligence could be made.[27][28] Hospitals were forbidden by law to turn away patients who were unable to pay.[29] These hospitals were financially supported by waqfs, as well as state funds.[25]

In India, public hospitals existed at least since the reign of Firuz Shah Tughlaq in the 14th century. The Mughal emperor Jahangir in the 17th century established hospitals in large cities at government expense with records showing salaries and grants for medicine being paid for by the government.[30]

In China, during the Song dynasty, the state began to take on social welfare functions previously provided by Buddhist monasteries and instituted public hospitals, hospices and dispensaries.[31]

Early modern and Enlightenment Europe

[edit]
A hospital ward in 6th century France

In Europe the medieval concept of Christian care evolved during the 16th and 17th centuries into a secular one. In England, after the dissolution of the monasteries in 1540 by King Henry VIII, the church abruptly ceased to be the supporter of hospitals, and only by direct petition from the citizens of London, were the hospitals St Bartholomew's, St Thomas's and St Mary of Bethlehem's (Bedlam) endowed directly by the crown; this was the first instance of secular support being provided for medical institutions.

In 1682, Charles II founded the Royal Hospital Chelsea as a retirement home for old soldiers known as Chelsea Pensioners, an instance of the use of the word "hospital" to mean an almshouse.[32] Ten years later, Mary II founded the Royal Hospital for Seamen, Greenwich, with the same purpose.[33]

1820 engraving of Guy's Hospital in London, one of the first voluntary hospitals to be established in 1724
Ruins of the Hospital San Nicolás de Bari in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, recognized by UNESCO for being the oldest hospital built in the Americas.[34][35] Built between 1514 and 1541.
Pennsylvania Hospital (now part of University of Pennsylvania Health System). Founded in 1751, it is the earliest established public hospital in the United States.[36][37][a] It is also home to America's first surgical amphitheatre and its first medical library.

The voluntary hospital movement began in the early 18th century, with hospitals being founded in London by the 1720s, including Westminster Hospital (1719) promoted by the private bank C. Hoare & Co and Guy's Hospital (1724) funded from the bequest of the wealthy merchant, Thomas Guy.

Other hospitals sprang up in London and other British cities over the century, many paid for by private subscriptions. St Bartholomew's in London was rebuilt from 1730 to 1759,[38] and the London Hospital, Whitechapel, opened in 1752.

These hospitals represented a turning point in the function of the institution; they began to evolve from being basic places of care for the sick to becoming centers of medical innovation and discovery and the principal place for the education and training of prospective practitioners. Some of the era's greatest surgeons and doctors worked and passed on their knowledge at the hospitals.[39] They also changed from being mere homes of refuge to being complex institutions for the provision and advancement of medicine and care for sick. The Charité was founded in Berlin in 1710 by King Frederick I of Prussia as a response to an outbreak of plague.

Voluntary hospitals also spread to Colonial America; Bellevue Hospital in New York City opened in 1736, first as a workhouse and then later as a hospital; Pennsylvania Hospital in Philadelphia opened in 1752, New York Hospital, now Weill Cornell Medical Center[40] in New York City opened in 1771, and Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston opened in 1811.

When the Vienna General Hospital opened in 1784 as the world's largest hospital, physicians acquired a new facility that gradually developed into one of the most important research centers.[41]

Another Enlightenment era charitable innovation was the dispensary; these would issue the poor with medicines free of charge. The London Dispensary opened its doors in 1696 as the first such clinic in the British Empire. The idea was slow to catch on until the 1770s,[42] when many such organisations began to appear, including the Public Dispensary of Edinburgh (1776), the Metropolitan Dispensary and Charitable Fund (1779) and the Finsbury Dispensary (1780). Dispensaries were also opened in New York 1771, Philadelphia 1786, and Boston 1796.[43]

The Royal Naval Hospital, Stonehouse, Plymouth, was a pioneer of hospital design in having "pavilions" to minimize the spread of infection. John Wesley visited in 1785, and commented "I never saw anything of the kind so complete; every part is so convenient, and so admirably neat. But there is nothing superfluous, and nothing purely ornamented, either within or without." This revolutionary design was made more widely known by John Howard, the philanthropist. In 1787 the French government sent two scholar administrators, Coulomb and Tenon, who had visited most of the hospitals in Europe.[44] They were impressed and the "pavilion" design was copied in France and throughout Europe.

19th century

[edit]
A ward of the hospital at Scutari, where Florence Nightingale worked and helped to restructure the modern hospital

English physician Thomas Percival (1740–1804) wrote a comprehensive system of medical conduct, Medical Ethics; or, a Code of Institutes and Precepts, Adapted to the Professional Conduct of Physicians and Surgeons (1803) that set the standard for many textbooks.[45] In the mid-19th century, hospitals and the medical profession became more professionalised, with a reorganisation of hospital management along more bureaucratic and administrative lines. The Apothecaries Act 1815 made it compulsory for medical students to practise for at least half a year at a hospital as part of their training.[46]

Florence Nightingale pioneered the modern profession of nursing during the Crimean War when she set an example of compassion, commitment to patient care and diligent and thoughtful hospital administration. The first official nurses' training programme, the Nightingale School for Nurses, was opened in 1860, with the mission of training nurses to work in hospitals, to work with the poor and to teach.[47] Nightingale was instrumental in reforming the nature of the hospital, by improving sanitation standards and changing the image of the hospital from a place the sick would go to die, to an institution devoted to recuperation and healing. She also emphasised the importance of statistical measurement for determining the success rate of a given intervention and pushed for administrative reform at hospitals.[48]

By the late 19th century, the modern hospital was beginning to take shape with a proliferation of a variety of public and private hospital systems. By the 1870s, hospitals had more than trebled their original average intake of 3,000 patients. In continental Europe the new hospitals generally were built and run from public funds. The National Health Service, the principal provider of health care in the United Kingdom, was founded in 1948. During the nineteenth century, the Second Viennese Medical School emerged with the contributions of physicians such as Carl Freiherr von Rokitansky, Josef Škoda, Ferdinand Ritter von Hebra, and Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis. Basic medical science expanded and specialisation advanced. Furthermore, the first dermatology, eye, as well as ear, nose, and throat clinics in the world were founded in Vienna, being considered as the birth of specialised medicine.[49]

20th century and beyond

[edit]
Cabell Huntington Hospital located in Huntington, West Virginia (2014)
White H on blue background, used to represent hospitals in the US.
During peacetime, hospitals are often marked by symbols. A white 'H' on a blue background is often used in the United States. During military conflicts, a hospital may be marked with the emblem of the red cross, red crescent or red crystal in accordance with the Geneva Conventions.

By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, medical advancements such as anesthesia and sterile techniques that could make surgery less risky, and the availability of more advanced diagnostic devices such as X-rays, continued to make hospitals a more attractive option for treatment.[50]

Modern hospitals measure various efficiency metrics such as occupancy rates, the average length of stay, time to service, patient satisfaction, physician performance, patient readmission rate, inpatient mortality rate, and case mix index.[51]

In the United States, the number of hospitalizations grew to its peak in 1981 with 171 admissions per 1,000 Americans and 6,933 hospitals.[50] This trend subsequently reversed, with the rate of hospitalization falling by more than 10% and the number of US hospitals shrinking from 6,933 in 1981 to 5,534 in 2016.[52] Occupancy rates also dropped from 77% in 1980 to 60% in 2013.[53] Among the reasons for this are the increasing availability of more complex care elsewhere such as at home or the physicians' offices and also the less therapeutic and more life-threatening image of the hospitals in the eyes of the public.[50][54] In the US, a patient may sleep in a hospital bed, but be considered outpatient and "under observation" if not formally admitted.[55]

In the U.S., inpatient stays are covered under Medicare Part A, but a hospital might keep a patient under observation which is only covered under Medicare Part B, and subjects the patient to additional coinsurance costs.[55] In 2013, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced a "two-midnight" rule for inpatient admissions,[56] intended to reduce an increasing number of long-term "observation" stays being used for reimbursement.[55] This rule was later dropped in 2018.[56] In 2016 and 2017, healthcare reform and a continued decline in admissions resulted in US hospital-based healthcare systems performing poorly financially.[57] Microhospitals, with bed capacities of between eight and fifty, are expanding in the United States.[58] Similarly, freestanding emergency rooms, which transfer patients that require inpatient care to hospitals, were popularised in the 1970s[59] and have since expanded rapidly across the United States.[59]

The Catholic Church is the largest non-government provider of health careservices in the world.[60] It has around 18,000 clinics, 16,000 homes for the elderly and those with special needs, and 5,500 hospitals, with 65 percent of them located in developing countries.[61] In 2010, the Church's Pontifical Council for the Pastoral Care of Health Care Workers said that the Church manages 26% of the world's health care facilities.[62]

Funding

[edit]
Clinical Hospital Dubrava in Zagreb, Croatia

Modern hospitals derive funding from a variety of sources. They may be funded by private payment and health insurance or public expenditure, charitable donations.

In the United Kingdom, the National Health Service delivers health care to legal residents funded by the state "free at the point of delivery", and emergency care free to anyone regardless of nationality or status. Due to the need for hospitals to prioritise their limited resources, there is a tendency in countries with such systems for 'waiting lists' for non-crucial treatment, so those who can afford it may take out private health care to access treatment more quickly.[63]

In the United States, hospitals typically operate privately and in some cases on a for-profit basis, such as HCA Healthcare.[64] The list of procedures and their prices are billed with a chargemaster; however, these prices may be lower for health care obtained within healthcare networks.[65] Legislation requires hospitals to provide care to patients in life-threatening emergency situations regardless of the patient's ability to pay.[66] Privately funded hospitals which admit uninsured patients in emergency situations incur direct financial losses, such as in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.[64]

Quality and safety

[edit]

As the quality of health care has increasingly become an issue around the world, hospitals have increasingly had to pay serious attention to this matter. Independent external assessment of quality is one of the most powerful ways to assess this aspect of health care, and hospital accreditation is one means by which this is achieved. In many parts of the world such accreditation is sourced from other countries, a phenomenon known as international healthcare accreditation, by groups such as Accreditation Canada in Canada, the Joint Commission in the U.S., the Trent Accreditation Scheme in Great Britain, and the Haute Autorité de santé (HAS) in France. In England, hospitals are monitored by the Care Quality Commission. In 2020, they turned their attention to hospital food standards after seven patient deaths from listeria linked to pre-packaged sandwiches and salads in 2019, saying "Nutrition and hydration is part of a patient's recovery."[67]

The World Health Organization reported in 2011 that being admitted to a hospital was far riskier than flying. Globally, the chance of a patient being subject to a treatment error in a hospital was about 10%, and the chance of death resulting from an error was about one in 300. according to Liam Donaldson. 7% of hospitalised patients in developed countries, and 10% in developing countries, acquire at least one health care-associated infection. In the U.S., 1.7 million infections are acquired in hospital each year, leading to 100,000 deaths, figures much worse than in Europe where there were 4.5 million infections and 37,000 deaths.[68]

Architecture

[edit]

Modern hospital buildings are designed to minimise the effort of medical personnel and the possibility of contamination while maximising the efficiency of the whole system. Travel time for personnel within the hospital and the transportation of patients between units is facilitated and minimised. The building also should be built to accommodate heavy departments such as radiology and operating rooms while space for special wiring, plumbing, and waste disposal must be allowed for in the design.[69]

However, many hospitals, even those considered "modern", are the product of continual and often badly managed growth over decades or even centuries, with utilitarian new sections added on as needs and finances dictate. As a result, Dutch architectural historian Cor Wagenaar has called many hospitals:

"... built catastrophes, anonymous institutional complexes run by vast bureaucracies, and totally unfit for the purpose they have been designed for ... They are hardly ever functional, and instead of making patients feel at home, they produce stress and anxiety."[70]

Some newer hospitals now try to re-establish design that takes the patient's psychological needs into account, such as providing more fresh air, better views and more pleasant colour schemes. These ideas harken back to the late eighteenth century, when the concept of providing fresh air and access to the 'healing powers of nature' were first employed by hospital architects in improving their buildings.[70]

The research of British Medical Association is showing that good hospital design can reduce patient's recovery time. Exposure to daylight is effective in reducing depression.[71] Single-sex accommodation help ensure that patients are treated in privacy and with dignity. Exposure to nature and hospital gardens is also important – looking out windows improves patients' moods and reduces blood pressure and stress level. Open windows in patient rooms have also demonstrated some evidence of beneficial outcomes by improving airflow and increased microbial diversity.[72][73] Eliminating long corridors can reduce nurses' fatigue and stress.[74]

Another ongoing major development is the change from a ward-based system (where patients are accommodated in communal rooms, separated by movable partitions) to one in which they are accommodated in individual rooms. The ward-based system has been described as very efficient, especially for the medical staff, but is considered to be more stressful for patients and detrimental to their privacy. A major constraint on providing all patients with their own rooms is however found in the higher cost of building and operating such a hospital; this causes some hospitals to charge for private rooms.[75]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ "Although Philadelphia General Hospital (1732) and Bellevue Hospital in New York (1736) are older, the Philadelphia General was founded as an almshouse, and Bellevue as a workhouse."

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Hospitals". World Health Organization. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  2. ^ a b c "India's 'production line' heart hospital". bbcnews.com. 1 August 2010. Archived from the original on 18 April 2017. Retrieved 13 October 2013.
  3. ^ Hall, Daniel (December 2008). "Altar and Table: A phenomenology of the surgeon-priest". Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 81 (4): 193–98. PMC 2605310. PMID 19099050. Although physicians were available in varying capacities in ancient Rome and Athens, the institution of a hospital dedicated to the care of the sick was a distinctly Christian innovation rooted in the monastic virtue and practise of hospitality. Arranged around the monastery were concentric rings of buildings in which the life and work of the monastic community was ordered. The outer ring of buildings served as a hostel in which travellers were received and boarded. The inner ring served as a place where the monastic community could care for the sick, the poor and the infirm. Monks were frequently familiar with the medicine available at that time, growing medicinal plants on the monastery grounds and applying remedies as indicated. As such, many of the practicing physicians of the Middle Ages were also clergy.
  4. ^ Lovoll, Odd (1998). A Portrait of Norwegian Americans Today. U of Minnesota Press. p. 192. ISBN 978-0-8166-2832-2.
  5. ^ Cassell's Latin Dictionary, revised by J. Marchant & J. Charles, 260th. thousand.
  6. ^ a b c d e "Our Background". District Hospital Leadership Forum. Archived from the original on 14 July 2014. Retrieved 10 July 2014.
  7. ^ a b c d e Knox, Dennis. "District Hospitals' Important Mission". Payers &–° Providers. Archived from the original on 14 July 2014. Retrieved 10 July 2014.
  8. ^ "Specialty Hospital Update" (PDF). National Public Radio. 2004. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 July 2020. Retrieved 25 July 2020.
  9. ^ a b "Narayana Hrudayalaya Hospitals". fastcompany.com. 7 February 2012. Archived from the original on 13 October 2013. Retrieved 13 October 2013.
  10. ^ "What's a Teaching Hospital?". www.brennerchildrens.org. Retrieved 13 June 2020.
  11. ^ "Hospital beds per 1,000 people". Our World in Data. Retrieved 7 March 2020.
  12. ^ "The "virtual wards" supporting patients with covid-19 in the community". BMJ. 2020 (369): m2119. 5 June 2020. Retrieved 24 December 2020.
  13. ^ "Modern technology reduces hospital admissions". Building Better Healthcare. 2 December 2020. Retrieved 27 January 2021.
  14. ^ Legge, James (1965). A Record of Buddhistic Kingdoms: Being an Account by the Chinese Monk Fâ-Hien of his Travels in India and Ceylon (AD 399–414) in Search of the Buddhist Books of Discipline. Dev Publishers & Distributors.[page needed]
  15. ^ Arjuna Aluvihare, "Rohal Kramaya Lovata Dhayadha Kale Sri Lankikayo" Vidhusara Science Magazine, November 1993.
  16. ^ The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 22:2 Mehmet Mahfuz Söylemez, The Gundeshapur School: Its History, Structure, and Functions, p. 3.
  17. ^ Risse, G.B. Mending bodies, saving souls: a history of hospitals. 1990. p. 56
  18. ^ Ziegler, Tiffany A., Tiffany A. Ziegler, and Troyanos. Medieval Healthcare and the Rise of Charitable Institutions. Springer International Publishing, 2018, 33.
  19. ^ (Guenter Risse, Mending Bodies, Saving Souls: A History of Hospitals, 47–48).
  20. ^ Jan Pelikan, Jaroslav (13 August 2022). "Christianity: Curing and caring for the sick". Encyclopædia Britannica.
  21. ^ Catholic Encyclopedia[1] (2009) Accessed April 2011.
  22. ^ Byzantine medicine
  23. ^ Husain F. Nagamia, [Islamic Medicine History and Current practise], (2003), p. 24.
  24. ^ Glubb, Sir John Bagot (1969), A Short History of the Arab Peoples, retrieved 25 January 2008
  25. ^ a b "The Islamic Roots of the Modern Hospital". aramcoworld.com. Retrieved 20 March 2017.
  26. ^ Islamic Culture and the Medical Arts: Hospitals, United States National Library of Medicine Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  27. ^ Miller, Andrew C (2006). "Jundi-Shapur, bimaristans, and the rise of academic medical centres". Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 99 (12): 615–617. doi:10.1177/014107680609901208. ISSN 0141-0768. PMC 1676324. PMID 17139063. Another lasting advancement made during this time period was that of physician licensure. In 931 AD Caliph Al-Muqtadir learned that a patient had died in Baghdad as a result of a physician's error. Consequently, he ordered Sinan ibn Thabit to examine all those who practiced the art of healing. Of the 860 medical practitioners he examined, 160 failed. From that time on, licensing examinations were required and administered in various places. Licensing boards were set up under a government official called Muhtasib, or inspector general. The chief physician gave oral and practical examinations, and if the young physician was successful, the Muhtasib administered the Hippocratic Oath and issued a license to practice medicine.
  28. ^ Alatas, Syed Farid (2006). "From Jami'ah to University: Multiculturalism and Christian–Muslim Dialogue". Current Sociology. 54 (1): 112–32. doi:10.1177/0011392106058837. S2CID 144509355.
  29. ^ "Islamic Culture and the Medical Arts: Hospitals". www.nlm.nih.gov. Archived from the original on 21 January 2024. Retrieved 21 January 2024.
  30. ^ Ikram, Sheikh Mohamad (1964). "Economic and Social Developments under the Mughals". Muslim Civilization in India. Columbia University Press. p. 223. ISBN 978-0-231-02580-5.
  31. ^ Goldschmidt, Asaf (2023). "Reacting to Epidemics: The Innovative Imperial Public Health System during the Late Northern Song Dynasty". Chinese Medicine and Culture. 6 (1): 68–75. doi:10.1097/MC9.0000000000000041.
  32. ^ The Royal Hospital Chelsea (Norwich: Jarrold Publishing, 2002), pp. 3–4
  33. ^ J. Bold, P. Guillery, D. Kendall, Greenwich: an architectural history of the Royal Hospital for Seamen and the Queen's House (Yale University Press, 2001), pp. 4–7
  34. ^ "Colonial City of Santo Domingo. Outstanding Universal Value". UNESCO World Heritage Centre website.
  35. ^ "Ruinas del Hospital San Nicolás de Barí". Lonely Planet.
  36. ^ Williams, William Henry (1976). America's First Hospital: The Pennsylvania Hospital, 1751–1841. Haverford House. ISBN 978-0-910702-02-7.
  37. ^ "NPGallery Digital Asset Management System: Pennsylvania Hospital", National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, retrieved 30 July 2019
  38. ^ "Painted window in St Bartholomew's Hospital". Archived from the original on 17 October 2021. Retrieved 7 June 2019.
  39. ^ Reinarz, Jonathan (2007). "Corpus Curricula: Medical Education and the Voluntary Hospital Movement". Brain, Mind and Medicine: Essays in Eighteenth-Century Neuroscience. pp. 43–52. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-70967-3_4. ISBN 978-0-387-70966-6.
  40. ^ "General Acute Care Hospital in New York". Archived from the original on 16 February 2023. Retrieved 6 October 2019.
  41. ^ Roderick E. McGrew, Encyclopedia of Medical History (Macmillan 1985), p. 139.
  42. ^ Freeman GK (2017). "Books: The Dispensaries: Healthcare for the Poor Before the NHS: Britain's Forgotten Health-care System: Dispensaries: An Alternative to General Practice?". Br J Gen Pract. 67 (655): 81. doi:10.3399/bjgp17X689281. PMC 5308110. PMID 28126876.
  43. ^ Michael Marks Davis; Andrew Robert Warner (1918). Dispensaries, Their Management and Development: A Book for Administrators, Public Health Workers, and All Interested in Better Medical Service for the People. MacMillan. pp. 2–3.
  44. ^ Surgeon Vice Admiral A Revell in http://www.histansoc.org.uk/uploads/9/5/5/2/9552670/volume_19.pdf Archived 6 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine
  45. ^ Waddington Ivan (1975). "The Development of Medical Ethics – A Sociological Analysis". Medical History. 19 (1): 36–51. doi:10.1017/s002572730001992x. PMC 1081608. PMID 1095851.
  46. ^ Porter, Roy (1999) [1997]. The Greatest Benefit to Mankind: A Medical History of Humanity from Antiquity to the Present. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. pp. 316–17. ISBN 978-0-393-31980-4.
  47. ^ Kathy Neeb (2006). Fundamentals of Mental Health Nursing. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company. ISBN 978-0-8036-2034-6.
  48. ^ Nightingale, Florence (August 1999). Florence Nightingale: Measuring Hospital Care Outcomes. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. ISBN 978-0-86688-559-1. Retrieved 13 March 2010.[permanent dead link]
  49. ^ Erna Lesky, The Vienna Medical School of the 19th Century (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976)
  50. ^ a b c Emanuel, Ezekiel J. (25 February 2018). "Opinion | Are Hospitals Becoming Obsolete?". The New York Times.
  51. ^ "Hospital Industry's 10 Most Critical Metrics – Guiding Metrics". guidingmetrics.com. Retrieved 25 November 2018.
  52. ^ "Fast Facts on U.S. Hospitals, 2018 | AHA". 19 July 2024.
  53. ^ "As admissions have slumped and outpatient care booms, hospitals closing or shrinking". Modern Healthcare. Retrieved 25 November 2018.
  54. ^ "Estimating Health Care-Associated Infections and Deaths in U.S. Hospitals, 2002" (PDF). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 October 2011. Retrieved 9 September 2023.
  55. ^ a b c "Two-Midnight and Observation Rule – Chicago Medical Society". www.cmsdocs.org. Archived from the original on 25 November 2018. Retrieved 25 November 2018.
  56. ^ a b "CMS drops two-midnight rule's inpatient payment cuts". Modern Healthcare. Retrieved 25 November 2018.
  57. ^ "How U.S. Hospitals and Health Systems Can Reverse Their Sliding Financial Performance". Harvard Business Review. 5 October 2017. Retrieved 25 November 2018.
  58. ^ Staff (11 April 2017). "5 common questions about micro-hospitals, answered". www.beckershospitalreview.com. Retrieved 25 November 2018.
  59. ^ a b "When the tiny hospital can't survive: Free-standing EDs with primary care seen as new rural model". Modern Healthcare. 7 September 2011. Retrieved 14 May 2019.
  60. ^ Agnew, John (12 February 2010). "Deus Vult: The Geopolitics of Catholic Church". Geopolitics. 15 (1): 39–61. doi:10.1080/14650040903420388. S2CID 144793259.
  61. ^ Calderisi, Robert. Earthly Mission - The Catholic Church and World Development; TJ International Ltd; 2013; p.40
  62. ^ "Catholic hospitals comprise one quarter of world's healthcare, council reports :: Catholic News Agency (CNA)". Catholic News Agency. 10 February 2010. Retrieved 17 August 2012.
  63. ^ Johnston, Martin (21 January 2008). "Surgery worries create insurance boom". The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 3 October 2011.
  64. ^ a b Hospitals in New Orleans see surge in uninsured patients but not public fundsUSA Today, Wednesday 26 April 2006
  65. ^ Richmond, Barak D.; Kitzman, Nick; Milstein, Arnold; Schulman, Kevin A. (28 April 2017). "Battling the Chargemaster: A Simple Remedy to Balance Billing for Unavoidable Out-of-Network Care". The American Journal of Managed Care. 23 (4). Retrieved 12 March 2023.
  66. ^ "Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA)". Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 26 March 2012. Retrieved 17 May 2013.
  67. ^ "CQC to inspect hospitals on food standards after patient deaths". Health Service Journal. 17 November 2020. Retrieved 24 December 2020.
  68. ^ "Going into hospital far riskier than flying: WHO". Reuters. 21 July 2011. Retrieved 27 January 2019.
  69. ^ Annmarie Adams, Medicine by Design: The Architect and the Modern Hospital, 1893–1943 (2009)
  70. ^ a b "Healing by design". Ode. July–August 2006. Archived from the original on 17 October 2007. Retrieved 10 February 2008.
  71. ^ Yamaguchi, Yuhgo (5 October 2015). "Better Healing from Better Hospital Design". Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Retrieved 30 August 2022.
  72. ^ Sample, Ian (20 February 2012). "Open hospital windows to stem spread of infections, says microbiologist". The Guardian. Retrieved 12 March 2018.
  73. ^ Bowdler, Neil (26 April 2013). "Closed windows 'increase infection'". BBC News. Retrieved 12 March 2018.
  74. ^ "The psychological and social needs of patients". British Medical Association. 7 January 2011. Archived from the original on 14 March 2011. Retrieved 14 March 2011.
  75. ^ Rosenberg, Julian (15 November 2004). "Health administrators go shopping for new hospital designs". National Review of Medicine. Volume 1, no. 21. Archived from the original on 26 December 2008.

Bibliography

[edit]

History of hospitals

[edit]
  • Brockliss, Lawrence, and Colin Jones. "The Hospital in the Enlightenment", in The Medical World of Early Modern France (Oxford UP, 1997), pp. 671–729; covers France 1650–1800
  • Chaney, Edward (2000), "'Philanthropy in Italy': English Observations on Italian Hospitals 1545–1789", in: The Evolution of the Grand Tour: Anglo-Italian Cultural Relations since the Renaissance, 2nd ed. London, Routledge, 2000.
  • Connor, J.T.H. "Hospital History in Canada and the United States", Canadian Bulletin of Medical History, 1990, Vol. 7 Issue 1, pp. 93–104
  • Crawford, D.S. Bibliography of Histories of Canadian hospitals and schools of nursing.
  • Gorsky, Martin. "The British National Health Service 1948–2008: A Review of the Historiography", Social History of Medicine, December 2008, Vol. 21 Issue 3, pp. 437–60
  • Harrison, Mar, et al. eds. From Western Medicine to Global Medicine: The Hospital Beyond the West (2008)
  • Horden, Peregrine. Hospitals and Healing From Antiquity to the Later Middle Ages (2008)
  • McGrew, Roderick E. Encyclopedia of Medical History (1985)
  • Morelon, Régis; Rashed, Roshdi (1996), Encyclopedia of the History of Arabic Science, vol. 3, Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-12410-2
  • Porter, Roy. The Hospital in History, with Lindsay Patricia Granshaw (1989) ISBN 978-0-415-00375-9
  • Risse, Guenter B. Mending Bodies, Saving Souls: A History of Hospitals (1999); world coverage
  • Rosenberg, Charles E. The Care of Strangers: The Rise of America's Hospital System (1995); history to 1920
  • Scheutz, Martin et al. eds. Hospitals and Institutional Care in Medieval and Early Modern Europe (2009)
  • Wall, Barbra Mann. American Catholic Hospitals: A Century of Changing Markets and Missions (Rutgers University Press, 2011). ISBN 978-0-8135-4940-8
[edit]

 

Frequently Asked Questions

State variations affect coding practices by requiring coders to understand different reimbursement rates and policies for each states Medicaid program. Coders must ensure that documentation aligns with specific state guidelines to secure appropriate payments.
Factors include state-level policy decisions, cost of living, healthcare needs, budget constraints, and negotiation processes between states and healthcare providers. These elements create distinct reimbursement structures that vary widely from one state to another.
Yes, resources such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) website, state-specific Medicaid manuals, coding associations like AAPC or AHIMA, and continuous education programs can help coders stay informed about changes in reimbursement policies.
Medical coders can address discrepancies by ensuring accurate and thorough documentation, staying current with training on state-specific guidelines, communicating effectively with billing departments, and utilizing auditing tools to verify compliance with regulations.